Badger Bulletin

Take Action – Submit Comments for Grizzly Plan

Badger Bulletin

Take Action – Submit Comments for Grizzly Plan

Comment on Proposed Changes to Grizzly Bear Recovery

On January 15th, the US Fish and Wildlife Service rejected petitions from Montana and Wyoming to remove Endangered Species Act protections for grizzly bears in the Northern Continental Divide (which includes Glacier and the Badger-Two Medicine), and Greater Yellowstone ecosystems, recognizing that grizzly bears are not yet recovered. At the same time, the Fish and Wildlife Service proposes to substantially diminish where grizzly bears are protected in the lower 48 states, and to provide far greater latitude for grizzly bear managers, livestock owners, and certain other individuals to kill grizzly bears involved in conflicts with people, livestock or property.

The announcement kicked off a formal rulemaking process, which includes a 60-day public comment period that ends March 17th.

winter-grizzly

Public Meetings Update

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has announced that due to the recent transition and the need for the new Administration to review the recent grizzly bear proposed rule, the Service is canceling all four of the public meetings that the agency voluntarily scheduled on this proposal. We will let you know if/when the meetings and hearings are rescheduled.

 

Submit Written Comment

Public comment on the proposed rules is due March 17th, 2025. See our suggested talking points.

 

Mail comments to:

Public Comment Processing
Attn: FWS-R6-ES-2024-0186
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
MS: PRB/3W
5275 Leesburg Pike
Falls Creek, VA 22041-3803

Thank you for taking time to stand up for grizzly bears!

Your input is needed to ensure the proposed changes will effectively connect isolated grizzly bear populations across Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, while maintaining the Fish and Wildlife Service's commitment to proven non-lethal methods as the primary approach for preventing and managing bear conflicts.

Suggested Comments

Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance suggests you include the following topics in your comments:

    • Tell the agency you care about grizzly bears  –  It is vital the Service hears why people value grizzly bears, especially from those of us who routinely share the landscape with bears in some way. Yes, living with grizzly bears can pose certain challenges, but it is something we can all learn to do and have a responsibility to do if we live in grizzly country. Grizzly bears are part of what makes Montana – and the northern Rockies – a unique and beautiful place to live.
    • Express your support for the agency’s decision to keep the NCDE population listed as Threatened – This population is the lynchpin to grizzly recovery throughout the northern Rockies. Continued federal protections offer the best chance for these bears to connect with other isolated populations in the GYE, Cabinet / Yaak, and Idaho, connectivity essential to durable recovery across the northern Rockies.
    • Express appreciation for the agency’s emphasis on establishing natural connectivity between populations and recovery zones – According to the best available science, establishing natural genetic and demographic connectivity between currently isolated grizzly bear populations in Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho is essential to long-term viability of grizzly bears in the northern Rockies. Protecting habitat and minimizing conflicts to facilitate movement and lower densities of resident bears across  connectivity areas is essential to making this happen.
    • Tell the agency that non-lethal tools and education must remain the primary way to manage and prevent conflicts, not lethal measures – Non-lethal measures, such as improved animal husbandry, electric fencing, securing attractants, hazing, or proper use of bear spray, have proven essential in preventing and managing conflicts to minimize the death of grizzly bears, and harm to people, livestock and livelihoods. We strongly encourage and support continued investment in such measures as well as in public education about living and recreating responsibly with grizzly bears.
    • Express strong reservations that proposed 4(d) rule will lead to unnecessary grizzly bear deaths – While we recognize that some more flexibility and efficiency for state and tribal wildlife managers, livestock owners, and certain other individuals to respond to grizzly bear conflicts with lethal measures may be beneficial to facilitating continued cooperation in grizzly bear management, the proposed rule appears to provide way too much latitude, and rely way too much on individual judgement on when it is acceptable to do so. Clearer criteria and stronger sideboards are needed, especially at a time when human-caused mortality is at record levels!
    • Oppose any issuance of permits to private individuals to kill a grizzly bear involved in conflicts with livestock on public lands!  – Public lands are essential wildlife habitat, lands and wildlife that belong to all of us. Grazing public land is a privilege, not a right. If a grizzly must be euthanized, it should only be done after non-lethal measures have been tried and ineffective, and then only by trained agents to ensure the correct bear is targeted.
    • Ask the Fish and Wildlife Service to explain the basis for designating all grizzly bears and recovery areas as a single “Distinct Population Segment” –  We are concerned the new classification may impede recovery of grizzly bears in the northern Rockies by making future delisting contingent on the successful recovery of grizzly bears in the Washington Cascades when these areas should biologically and socially be treated as separate processes. The new classification could unnecessarily impede natural expansion of grizzly bears into suitable habitats beyond the newly defined boundary.

For your comments to carry the most weight, please be sure to craft them in your own words. Be as specific, substantive, and personal as you can be. However, don’t sweat it. Any comments that speak up for grizzly bears are better than agonizing over the perfect ones.

Sign up for our mailing list to receive updates about this project.

Learn More

The proposed rule and supporting documents, including the latest Species Status Assessment Report can be found on the USFWS website.

Read the proposed rule and supporting documents to learn more.

Thank you for taking time to comment.

Questions? Want more information? Please email Peter Metcalf at peter@glaciertwomedicine.org

Giving to Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance helps us continue to track and advocate for important issues like this one. Please consider a gift to safeguard the land, water, and wildlife found in the northeastern Crown of the Continent.
Scroll to Top